Franklin D. Roosevelt took to the airwaves on Dec. 8, 1941, to tell us we were at war. But imagine he didn’t announce that Japan had just bombed Pearl Harbor. Imagine that, instead, he said there had been only a “minor disturbance in the Pacific,” that it was “nothing to worry about,” and that the problem would “just go away.” This is how Donald Trump has approached the COVID crisis.
Read More
What if Democrats tried to suppress the vote? Here’s a tongue-in-cheek look at what that might look like. Please note: This is satire. No one should, under any circumstances, seek to impede or discourage American citizens — regardless of their political affiliation — from exercising their constitutionally protected right to vote.
Read More
Why should people refuse to wear a mask? How is it more of a hardship to put a piece of cloth over your face than to spend several days on a respirator in the ICU (at a cost of thousands of dollars)? Of course, that won’t happen to them, because they’re special, chosen people. They’re “immune.” They don’t have to wear seat belts or condoms, either. It’s all such a terrible inconvenience. But this isn’t really about personal freedom. It’s a repudiation of personal responsibility.
Read More
It’s not “herd immunity,” it’s mass infection and deliberate exposure. But perhaps the term herd immunity can be instructive in one sense: A herd is a group of stupid, docile, domesticated animals. Like cattle. They’re herded into an area by those who control them and, ultimately, exploited for their milk and butchered for their meat.
Read More
If you tell the public you don’t care about a president enlisting foreign aid to undermine an American election, do you think anything less will somehow matter? Hunter Biden? Hillary Clinton’s emails? Hey, Republicans, nobody cares. Nobody, anyway, except the people who already watch Fox News and are all-in on your politics of grievance, outrage, and resentment.
Read More
If a nominee dodges questions about foundational concepts, there’s simply no basis for senators to make an informed decision about a nomination beyond blind partisanship — which is what they tend to use anyway. … Barrett’s evasiveness (which, to be fair, has been practiced by other nominees, as well) is the confirmation hearing’s version of “taking the Fifth.”
Read More